“Enthusiasm is the electricity of life” – Gordon Parks

“Enthusiasm is the electricity of life”​ – Gordon Parks

Kerr Financial Group

Kildare Asset Mgt.

Jeffrey J. Kerr, CFA


February 18, 2020 – DJIA = 29,398 – S&P 500 = 3,380 – Nasdaq = 9,731


Tesla makes electric cars.  Their cars are a high-end product with many exciting features.  Tesla Autopilot is a driver assistance system that includes lane centering, adaptive cruise control, and self-parking.  Their supporters passionately believe they are a cutting edge technology company that is transforming the automobile industry.  Further Tesla’s “sister” companies have solar and space travel initiatives.

Tesla also produces controversy.  Elon Musk, the CEO, has been fined by the SEC for lying to investors and many think it was a token fine given the circumstances and the penalty should have been much more severe.  Upper management has been a revolving door with repeated departures in key positions such as CFO chief legal officer.  Many analysts are suspicious of the published financial statements.  Finally, complaints over quality and customer service proliferate social media.

In case you’ve been distracted by trying to keep your New Year’s resolutions, Tesla’s stock price (symbol = TSLA) has been doing very, very well.  At the end of October, it traded around $250 per share.  It touched $960 in early February.  Below is a one-year chart that shows the recent parabolic move.


From a financial perspective, Tesla is making progress.  They reported record deliveries in the latest quarter and posted an unexpected profit.  They delivered their first vehicle made in China and announced plans for a new plant in Germany.

After the stock’s almost tripling in three months, the company, who needs money, did a secondary stock offering.  Normally, a company’s stock drops with a secondary offering as current shareholders are diluted.  In other words, after a secondary offering, there is a greater number of shares to divide into the earnings which means lower earnings per share.   Hopefully, after some time and the newly raised capital is becoming productive, the stock starts to move higher again.

Tesla’s stocks suffered the typical pullback.  However, instead lasting months, Tesla’s pullback was only for a few hours.  The secondary offering price was set at $767 which translated into around $2 billion raised (investors buying the secondary offering got it at $767 per share).  This was a 4.6% discount to the previous day’s closing price.  TSLA traded down to $787 and then reversed and closed narrowly lower than the previous day and well above the secondary offering.  It was a remarkable development which left the Tesla skeptics more confused and frustrated than the Democrats.  Not an easy task!

Tesla bulls naturally credit Elon Musk for this recent stock performance and it’s logical to associate a stock’s price with the performance of the company’s management.  In this case, Tesla investors should also credit their good fortune to Jerome Powell, the Federal Reserve, and the world’s central banks.

Tesla, Uber, We Works, and other recent startups partially owe their existence to central banks.  As the global monetary bureaucrats have manipulated interest rates to record low levels and pumped the system with liquidity, there are companies that exist that wouldn’t under historically normal interest rate conditions.

As a reminder of how unusual the current financial environment is, at the end of 2019 approximately $11 trillion of bonds were priced with a negative interest rate.  The ECB (European Central Bank) and BOJ (Bank of Japan) have basically cornered the European and Japanese fixed income markets by creating currency and using it to buy bonds in the open market.

Here in the U.S., the Fed’s involvement in the repo market began in September.  Chairman Powell will not call this effort another round of easing and maintains that it is temporary.  Nevertheless, it is pushing liquidity into the system which helps the financial markets.  Here is a graph showing the recent growth in the financial assets owned by the Fed.  The spike beginning last fall is easily seen.



While TSLA’s stock has been a star, the rest of the capital markets have also done well.  The major averages are up for 2020 along with the bond market.  It has not been easy as investors have had to deal with the Senate acquitting President Trump, the fallout from the State of the Union address, the coronavirus, and corporate earnings.  Here are how the major averages are performing for 2020 as of last Friday.

The added liquidity has helped the bond markets and yields have fallen as the 10-year and 30-year Treasury yields are approaching all-time lows.  Strangely, this drop in yields is taking place within a strong economy.  Normally, falling yields are a sign of economic weakness.  Last week the 10-year note closed at 1.59% and the 30-year bond settled at 2.04%.  This move lower could be related to worries of the economic impact of the coronavirus.

Looking at earnings releases, with over 1,100 companies reporting since the first of the year, 66% have exceeded their estimated earnings number.  Almost 65% have beaten their expected revenue levels.  However, looking forward, management guidance for the future has been a net negative (more reducing guidance than raising).  This could be a function of the economic uncertainty due to the virus as well as the upcoming U.S. elections.

The financial markets look forward and attempt to discount the future.  Given the news flow and the social division, it would seem obvious that the markets would be somewhat uneasy.  But this is not the case.  In fact, the stock market is trading at record high levels.  Of course, this could be part of the Tesla thesis.  As is the case with TSLA, the liquidity provided by global central banks might be masking the reality of the markets’ risk.

Tesla has been a controversial company.  Its supporters believe they can do no wrong while their critics think it is a fraud.  This discussion is not intended to recommend or discourage purchase of TSLA but rather to point out how the company has benefited from years of central bank intervention in the financial markets.

Concerning the Federal Reserve’s involvement in the capital markets, a question to ponder is whether this interference is a permanent situation.  Many expect central banks will ultimately return to historically normal policies.  That is getting harder to believe given that the Fed has been aggressively using unconventional monetary tools for over 10 years.  If the current financial environment become standard operating procedures, investment analysis and risk management will be a lot harder.  Quantifying the ability of hundreds of Ph.D.’s who are “data dependent” along with their capability to deal with self-inflicted crises will be an impossible task.  Kind of like explaining Tesla.



Pennies From Heaven

Kerr Financial Group

Kildare Asset Mgt.

Jeffrey J. Kerr, CFA



January 26, 2020 – DJIA = 28,989 – S&P 500 = 3,295 – Nasdaq = 9,314


“Pennies From Heaven”


The stock market is having a great start to 2020 which, of course, follows an outstanding 2019.  The large cap indexes are up 1.5% or more in the first 17 trading days.  The Dow Jones Industrial Average closed over 29,000 for the first time and the Nasdaq rallied above 9,000 also for the first time. The S&P 500 has had only 6 down closes since the start of the year.

Oddly, it’s become necessary to publicize these kinds of financial market developments.  Since the stock market has been on a steady upswing since Labor Day, the public has been infected with a sense that the markets can only go up.  Of course, this is not true but the human mind can be strong and convince us of untruths.  As a reminder, high levels of complacency can be dangerous as the stock market is risky, especially as prices move higher.

In addition to contentment, investors have been overwhelmed by other important headlines.  The elimination of Qasem Soleimani and Iran’s retaliation certainly deserved the country’s attention.  And calls by the talking heads that we were on the brink of World War III also caused many to focus outside the day’s financial news.

Naturally, the impeachment of President Trump is an important event. This is a historic period in time with significant cultural division approaching civil war type emotions.  Nevertheless, the impeachment hearings might not be as big a distraction as the broadcast of the proceedings captured few viewers.  Afternoon soap opera ratings were higher than the Democrats’ argument for removing the president.

Beyond these issues, there has been plenty of exciting football with the college bowl games followed by the NFL playoffs.  Further, we’ve had the resignation of Prince Harry and Meaghan Markle from the Royal Family (Megxit), the hypocrisy of Davos, and the possibility of Brad and Jennifer getting back together.  That’s clearly a full plate and tough competition for repetitive all-time highs in the stock market.

As challenging as it is, many are squeezing in the time to keep an eye on the markets.  In summary, they are seeing stocks moving up and interest rates moving down.  As mentioned, equities had a strong finish to 2019 which has continued in 2020.  The leaders have been large companies, the technology sector, and growth stocks.  Here are how the major averages are performing for 2020.


Dow Jones Industrial Average                               +1.6%

S&P 500                                                                    +2.0%

Nasdaq Composite                                                   +3.8%

Russell 2000                                                             -0.4%


The most unexpected stock market news in 2020 is that the Dow Jones Utility Index is the best performing index year-to-date.  The “Utes” are up 6% in 2020.  A utility is considered a slow growth company and these stocks are viewed as defensive investments.  They are the antithesis of technology and momentum stocks.

The rate a utility charges their customer is usually controlled by a state government or commission so revenue growth is often controlled.  Moreover, these businesses typically carry high debt levels as they borrow to build long-lived infrastructure from which they supply their customers the electricity, water, gas, etc.

Ironically, it is this large debt load, usually a drag on a company, that is helping.  Because of their debt, utilities are sensitive to interest rates – lower rates equals lower interest expense and vice versa.  Interest rates have fallen throughout January and investors have been buying utilities.

Concerning interest rates, the 10-year Treasury yield began the month around 1.9% and closed last Friday at 1.64%.  This is a big drop in the fixed income market and it helped energize the utilities index.  The 30-year Treasury bond’s yield has fallen from around 2.4% to below 2.1%.

The Federal Reserve has played a role in both the stock markets’ rise and the decline in interest rates.  Since September the Fed has been providing the financial system liquidity through a short-term interbank lending system referred to as the repo market.  “Repo” is short for purchase agreement and it is a loan from one bank to another in exchange for collateral (often Treasury bills).  These transactions are short term, often overnight.

Normally, banks work out imbalances between themselves via the repo market although the Fed has played the role of lender of last resort if needed.  For the first time since the financial crisis 10 years ago, the Fed became active in this market.  There hasn’t been a clear reason why they suddenly got involved.  Some theories center on regulatory requirements surrounding the collateral and liquidity thresholds that banks are to keep.

Whatever the circumstances behind this development, there is no debate that the Fed’s involvement has injected liquidity into the system.  The Fed insists that this is not another round of “quantitative easing” and further believe that it will be temporary.  While the mechanics are different from prior QE efforts, the result looks similar to other stimulus programs.

Below is a chart showing the size of the Federal Reserve’s balance sheet.  As can be seen, it was steady at around $4.5 trillion from 2015 through 2017.  As was announced by the Chairman Powell, there was a move to reduce the size of the assets in 2018 which coincided with capital market turmoil in late 2018.  This translates into the financial system getting disrupted when the Fed raised interest rates and withdrew money from the system.

The Fed’s involvement in the repo market is clearly shown in the “V” shaped reversal in in the assets held in September.  There is an approximately $450 billion injected in the banking system via the Fed’s role in the repo market since September.

Even if the Fed is not considering their repo involvement a formal policy, the markets think it is close enough.  The stimulus is at the short end of the fixed income market but indirectly impacts longer maturities and lowers yields.  Lower yields reduce corporate interest expenses and improve bottom lines.  In general, easy money helps economic activity which drives stock prices.

There is an appearance that the Fed has generated a financial utopia.  However, creating money (without corresponding value) and pushing it into the system cannot go on forever.  It can cause misallocations of capital which can lead to bubbles.

For now, that does not appear to be a concern.  Confidence in the Fed is boundless and the capital markets are clearly seeing a glass half full.  Nevertheless, there are many economic blemishes.  The global economy is struggling, citizen led protests are everywhere, and geopolitical tensions are high.  Apparently, investors think these issues have little consequence.  Let’s hope it’s not a case of too much focus on the Royal family.

3rd Quarter Review Letter



45 Lewis Street, Lackawanna RR Station

 Binghamton, NY 13901

The following is a copy of the 2019 3rd quarter letter sent to clients. It reviews the markets and the client account’s activity and performance for the 3rd quarter of 2019.


On July 31, 2019, the Federal Reserve cut the key short-term interest rate (federal funds rate) by one-quarter of one percent (0.25%). This was the first cut in over 10 years. The last cut was on December 16, 2008 as the Fed was responding to the global financial crisis. That cut reduced the fed funds rate to 0%.

Interest rates are one of the common tools used by those in charge of monetary policy. When the economy is slowing or contracting, interest rates are reduced in order to stimulate conditions. A central bank (the Federal Reserve in the U.S.) usually has a direct control on the short-term rates only. Reducing this rate normally results in more liquidity in the banking system which is expected to make its way into the financial system and encourage businesses to expand and hire more workers.

Central banks also use interest rates to slow down an economy that is expanding too rapidly. There is constant fear that strong growth might cause inflation. Higher interest rates increase the cost of capital and, generally, dampen business activity.

When the fed cut the fed funds rate to 0% in December 2008, the rate stayed there until December 2015, when it was raised one-quarter of one percent (0.25%). Since the first-rate hike, it has made its way back to 2.5% over a series of 9 raises with the taking place last December.

This latest interest rate cut was not your run of the mill type fed decision. Like a detective mystery, controversy and intrigue surrounded the announcement. First, many wondered why a cut was necessary when the unemployment rate is at record low levels and the economy is expanding. This led others to questioned if the Fed knew of a situation like an impaired financial institution or government that would increase stress on the global system.

Some wondered if Fed Chairman Jerome Powell was caving to pressure from the White House. The central bank claims independence from political influence (although there have been previous times that call this into question). Nevertheless, throughout the spring, President Trump posted a series of tweets calling for the Fed to lower interest rates. The president pointed out that the U.S. had the highest interest rates in the world and projected that the economy would be doing even better if the Fed lowered interest rates close to our international competitors.

The inverted yield curve within the U.S. treasury market could be another reason behind the July rate cut. Inversion means that bonds with short maturities have higher yields than longer maturities. Within normal fixed income markets, bonds that mature further in the future have higher yields than shorter maturing securities. This is to compensate for the increased uncertainty that comes with longer time frames.

Inverted yield curves, especially as measured by the difference between the 10- year Treasury note to the 2-year Treasury bill, are important. Historically, when inversion occurs between these two bonds, a recession follows. The Treasury yield curve was inverted in the spring and this could be another reason behind the July cut.

The Federal Reserve is the most powerful among the global central banks. And while central banks are traditionally focused solely on their economy, the U.S. central bank has an undefined role as the world’s central bank. This is supported by the fact that the U.S. dollar is the world’s reserve currency. With our interest rates being the highest in the world, the cost of acquiring needed greenbacks has becoming painful. This may have played a big part in the reducing interest rates in the U.S.

As significant as the July rate cut was, two more cuts have followed (one in September and one in October). Furthermore, the markets are expecting another cut in 2020. Meanwhile, the economy has not stumbled and continues to expand. Clearly these three cuts have lowered the amount of ammunition available. If interest rates are the chief mechanism in monetary policy, the Fed has 150 percentage points less to work with when the real problems arrive.

Of course, this assumes that the Fed is bound by 0% as the lowest level for interest rates. A large amount of the world’s debt currently carries a negative interest rates which leads to the question will the U.S. adopt negative interest rates. At a recent press conference, Jerome Powell declared that we won’t be needing negative interest rates and that there are other tools to use.

Still it is a situation to consider. Europe and Japan have had negative interest rates for several years and their economies have not imploded. On the other hand, they haven’t done exceptionally well. Negative interest rates in the U.S. could be a much different condition in the global financial system given our stature and critical role. If this were to occur, it could result in a loss of confidence. This would likely lead to large economic disruptions and financial system turmoil U.S. bond yields moved lower during the 3 rd quarter. The 10-year Treasury note began July at 2% and ended September at 1.67%. Likewise, the 30-year Treasury bond moved from 2.53% to 2.12% during the three months.

These may not seem significant but, for the bond market with its reputation as a lower risk asset class, these are big moves. This would be considered high volatility during any year for fixed income but, remember, this happened in three months.

While the bond market rallied (lower yields mean higher bond prices), the stock market zig zagged during the quarter. The major averages rose to all-time high levels in July but declined in August. This was followed by another move higher in September, but this reversed in the middle of the month and prices retreated. By the end of the quarter, stocks closed marginally higher from where they began July. Here are the numbers for the quarter and year to date.

Using a size weighted average, here is how the average Kildare Asset Management-Kerr Financial Group client’s account performed. This is calculated after all fees and expenses.

                                                                                              3rd Quarter       YTD

Kerr Financial Group- Kildare Asset Management-              -4.37%        6.31%


Stocks have enjoyed a very good year. In fact, for the first 9 months, the S&P 500 is having its best year in two decades. However, 2019’s gains are basically recapturing the losses for the 4th quarter 2018. The markets suffered wide significant losses at the end of last year. Here are the numbers for the major averages during the last three months of 2018.


Looking at a 52-week measurement gives a more subdued picture as compared to the 2019 year-to-date. Over the past 52-weeks (the end of September 2018 vs end of September 2019), the Dow and S&P are up only 1%, the Nasdaq is flat, and the Russell 2000 is down almost 9%.

During these time frames the indexes with the large companies have outperformed broader indexes. For both the 2019 year-to-date and the 2018 4th quarter data shown above, the large cap indexes did better than the Russell 2000 (the index with the most number of stocks of the 4 listed).

The S&P 1500 is an index that is comprised of the S&P 500 (large cap) the S&P Midcap 400, and the S&P 600 Smallcap 600. It offers a farther-reaching view of the U.S. stock market. This index provides a less exciting situation. The S&P 1500 is up 1.3% during the past 52 weeks. Going back to the end of 2017 (1¾ years) this average is up 10.4% or a little more 5% per year. If we measure from Lee’s IRA -6.34% 9.44% the highs in January 2018 (again almost 2 years), this index is up less than 3% or less than 1.5% annually if we count it as a 2-year stretch. This is a much different market than looking at 2019’s first 9 months.

Turning our view forward, there are many cross currents within the capital markets. Perhaps the largest is the social and political divide which has resulted in an impeachment inquiry of President Trump. Also, there is ongoing protests sitting governments in Hong Kong, Paris, Spain, and Chile. Brexit drags on with no resolution in sight. Tariffs and trade disagreements are extending longer than many had forecast.

Despite this list of bad headlines, the markets hold near record levels. Within the 3 rd quarter, there were plenty of opportunities for the pessimists to gain control and push stock prices lower. The bears weren’t able to succeed. That is not a claim that the sellers can’t return, but they may have missed their chance.

As mentioned, the economy continues to expand and, with lower interest rates, could accelerate that rate of growth. Although these are not normal times, markets usually don’t encounter material declines in election years. Further, the excitement and interesting news flow will carry on. It promises to be a fascinating end to this year and 2020. There will be opportunities and we will continue to work hard to find them.

Please feel free to call with any questions. Thank you for your business and continued confidence placed in me.




Jeffrey J. Kerr, CFA

“All in All, You’re Just Another Brick in the Wall”

Kerr Financial Group

Kildare Asset Mgt.

Jeffrey J. Kerr, CFA


December 9, 2019 – DJIA = 28,015 – S&P 500 = 3,145 – Nasdaq = 8,656

“All in All, You’re Just Another Brick in the Wall”[i]

Forty years ago, in 1979, the alternative rock group, Pink Floyd, recorded the cutting-edge album “The Wall”. This was their 8th album and was both commercially and critically successful. It was produced in the form of a ‘rock opera’ and became an iconic album in rock and roll history.

Remaining relevant after 4 decades is an accomplishment in anything but especially in the music business. Amazingly the fans of Pink Floyd (and “the Wall”) have grown over those years. However, it’s unlikely that these followers appreciate (if they can remember) the environment from which the album was made. It was a much different world. Inflation was raging, the Iranian government was holding 52 Americans hostage, disco was in, and everyone waited to make long distance phone calls on Sunday nights because that’s when the rates were reduced. An improbable backdrop for classic rock album.

Of course, walls have meaning in the financial markets and it goes beyond the address of the New York Stock Exchange (Wall Street). Perhaps a better analogy is the old adage that the stock market climbs a “wall of worry”. This wall refers to a barrage of bad news in which stock prices inexplicably and illogically rise.

The current stock market is a textbook example of climbing a “wall of worry”. Every aspect of our lives is seemingly filled with animosity and pessimism. Unquestionably, there is a raging bear market in civility.

Economically, there is some troubling news. Corporate profits are contracting as S&P 500 earnings growth is slowing. In the 3rd quarter, S&P 500 earnings declined around 2% as measured year-over-year.  Furthermore, it was the third consecutive quarter that Y-O-Y earnings declined. This marks the first time that this has happened since the end of 2015 through Q2 2016.

Another concern is that projected business investment is weak. This is an important indicator as long term investments have far reaching positive economic impact. Companies have been reluctant to commit to long term investments because of general uncertainty.

Purchasing manager surveys have been feeble. The latest ISM Manufacturing survey has been below the 50 level for the past several readings. These levels are normally associated with recessions.

Outside the economy, cultural malaise represents a large section of the stock market’s wall of worry. Conflict and discord are not normally associated with strong economic conditions and we are in a stong bull market in differences of opinion.

The House of Representatives effort to impeach President Trump has widened the societal division as the opposing sides have moved farther apart as the process has played out. If the House impeaches it will only be the third time that is has happened Presidents Johnson and Clinton). This will be the first time that a president is impeached in his first term.

Unfortunately, impeachment may become a regular part of Washington’s legislative schedule. If President Trump wins a second term and the Democrats maintain the majority in the House, Democratic leaders have stated they will impeach the President again.

Away from the impeachment, the general political landscape is poisonous. Insults, ridicule and blame are the daily norms of American politics. It is no wonder that Congress’s approval rating has been below 20% for most of 2019.

Beyond our borders, there are definitive examples of unrest. Hong Kong streets are filled with freedom protesters. The yellow vest movement has been active in Paris’s street for over a year as they call for President Macron to resign. A partial list of other areas experiencing protests includes Chile, India, Iran, Iraq, Russia, and Spain.

Another formidable portion of the wall is related to trade wars and tariffs. Rumors and reports of possible escalation of tariffs and other restrictions on international trade have been a big drag on corporate forecasts. Further this has increased concerns that tariffs will result in much higher prices for imported goods leading to higher costs and lower profits. Also, it could also be a headwind to the overall consumption.

It would be logical to assume seem that the financial markets would be in a similar tumultuous state. Instead the stock market is having a historic year and bond yields have moved lower. In other words, a classic case of the stock market climbing a wall of worry. Here are the major indexes year-to-date performance.

While stocks have had a terrific year, there is a slight distortion. Some of this rally is a rebound from a painful 2018 4th quarter where the markets plunged 20%. Nevertheless, stocks have had a good year despite a deteriorating news flow.

Of course, there has been good news that has assisted the U.S. stock market as it climbed its wall of worry. The job market is the best in a generation and the economy is growing although at a slower pace than a year ago. However, it’s hard to reconcile all time high stock prices with the negative headlines.

Another important part of this dynamic is that this bad news could be already discounted. This is a subjective view that is difficult to quantify. But if the news is prevailing and widely known, it’s likely that it has been acted upon. If that is the case, it could result in a situation where the pressure from the sellers has dried up. This can create a vacuum where prices move higher.

Another explanation is that the three recent interest rate cuts by the Fed will provide the needed economic support for 2020. Stocks discount the future and this 2019 rally could be in anticipation of this next growth spurt.

Predicting where and when this move ends is baffling. Recent selloffs (August and October) have been shallow, lacked follow through and were quickly reversed. This points to weakness by the bears. However, unless the economic data begins to support the record stock price levels, there is increased risk as stock prices move higher.

“In Everything, Give Thanks”

Kerr Financial Group

Kildare Asset Mgt.

Jeffrey J. Kerr, CFA



November 18, 2019 – DJIA = 28,004 – S&P 500 = 3,120 – Nasdaq = 8,540


“In Everything, Give Thanks”[i]


Wall Street has much to be thankful for.  The stock market is having a great year.  Fees from IPO’s, mergers, and deals are ringing the cash registers.  Corporate earnings remain good.  The Fed has returned to cutting interest rates and pumping money into the system.  And presidential tweets still move the market higher.

Just in time for Thanksgiving, all three major indexes finished the week at all-time highs.   In late October stocks broke out of a trading range that dated back to the spring and climbed to new records.  Friday was the 7th record close in November and the 22nd for 2019.

The stock market momentum has caught many off guard as concerns about impeachment, global protests, and some slightly softer economic data increased skepticism.  In addition to being unexpected, the move has been widespread with international stock markets rallying too.

As a part of these records, the Dow Jones Industrial Average closed above 28,000 for the first time.  It’s only been 4 months since it crossed 27,000. Of course, the percentage move required to move 1,000 point Dow points is much less at large numbers and it only needed a 3.7% move above this threshold.  Below is a chart showing the moves between 1,000 point increments for the Dow.  It also gives the percentage between the milestones.[ii]

As a painful reminder, 1,000 milestones aren’t always easy to hurdle even when it represents a small percentage move.  For example, it took almost 6 years for the Dow to move from 14,000 to 15,000 (a 7% move) as the financial crisis ravaged the markets.

The latest corporate earnings reports helped the stock market move to record levels.  In the 3rd quarter reports, 64.8% of companies exceeded their earnings estimate.  This is in contrast to the 2nd quarter numbers when less than 60% of the companies beat their estimate.  This 3rd quarter success rate might be a sign that the lower earnings in the 2nd quarter earnings was a one-time event.

Expenses can be managed and adjusted which can help make the bottom line hit the quarterly forecast.  Revenues aren’t as easy to massage so investors closely watch these numbers as well.  In the 3rd quarter, 57.9% of the companies beat their sales estimates.  This is a higher rate than the 1st and 2nd quarter but lower than the high numbers in late 2018 and early 2019 when almost 70% of reporting companies were exceeding their revenue estimates.  If the outlook for corporate earnings remain positive, stocks should continue to push higher.

Here are the year-to-date returns for the major averages.

Unlike Thanksgiving, this rally has global participation.  International stock markets are having good years and are moving higher with the U.S.  The major indexes in Australia, Canada, France, Germany, and Japan are all near 52-week highs.  Among developed economies, the United Kingdom and Spain are positive for 2019 but behind the returns from other markets.

While there are not many turkeys in the developed international sector, not all of the emerging market sector have enjoyed the rally.  Russian (up 35%), Brazilian (up 21%) and Indian (up 12%) investors are thankful, but some markets are not so rewarding.  Chile is down 7.4% this year and Hong Kong is ahead by less than 2%.

Returning to the U.S., Black Friday, the second uniquely American holiday in November, is upcoming.  This official start to Christmas and holiday shopping is late this year as November 2019 has 5 Fridays.  This has some retailers worried about the decreased number of days between Thanksgiving and Christmas.  Given that smartphones and computers are strong alternatives to driving to a store, it would seem that there will not be a shortage of time.

Below is a chart showing the growth of “clicks” and the decline of traditional buying of general merchandise.[iii]  From the peak around 2009, “bricks” shopping has been in a steady decline and was overtaken in recent years by the online purchases.  These trends are likely to continue as retailers have widely invested in their online experience and shoppers are comfortable using their phones and computers for shopping.

In a report last week, retail sales rose 0.3% in October which reversed a drop in September.  It signaled increased confidence in the U.S. consumer which is a large part of the economy.  This is a welcome sign for 2019’s holiday shopping and could drive further overall economic growth.  It could easily continue in 2020.

The bulls have much to be thankful for.   It’s been a great year and the recent breakout for U.S. stocks likely signals the direction for the rest of 2019.  That’s not to suggest it will be a smooth, steady climb but it appears that the downside is limited.  Furthermore, professional investors who are underperforming the indexes will be anxious to use any pullback as an opportunity to put money to work.

On the other hand, the bears, naturally, aren’t so grateful.  To be sure, there will come a time when they will be on the right side of the markets.  But in the meantime, let’s hope they can enjoy some turkey and watch some football.

[i] 1 Thessalonians, 5:18

[ii] Charlie Bilello, November 15, 2019

[iii] The Bespoke Report, November 15, 2019

October Newsletter

“…where the water ran deep and black, was found the hat of the unfortunate Ichabod, and close beside it a shattered pumpkin.”


October 21, 2019 – DJIA = 27,018 – S&P 500 = 3,000 – Nasdaq = 8,157


Halloween involves things like trick-or-treating, dressing up in costumes, playing pranks, scary stories and haunted houses. While it is an annual occurrence that takes place in late October, given the events during the past few years, it appears that Halloween traditions have become a year round, ongoing part of our culture.

For those in search of haunted houses, look no further than Washington, D.C. There is plenty of demonic activity taking place in both houses of Congress, the White House, the FBI, CIA, and, of course, the Federal Reserve.

When it comes to trick-or-treating, it’s hard to compete with Robert Mueller and James Comey.  However, the crew of politicians seeking the Democratic nomination certainly deserve consideration for tops in this category. And the most recent entry of LeBron James and the NBA choosing to protect their wallets over human rights is making its way higher on the list. The financial markets have negative interest rates which might be the cruelest trick of all.

There are abundant spooky stories too. Impeachment, the Democratic debates, Brexit, the Green New Deal, Adam Schiff, We Works, Trump rallies, Hunter Biden, Greta Thunberg, 97% marginal tax rates, Ukraine, and the repo market.

The capital markets have a history of frightening Octobers. Two stock market crashes plus things such as the failure of Long Term Capital Management and Lehman Brothers were autumn happenings. As recent as last year, October was a painful beginning to a miserable end of the year.

The start to this year’s October was a rough one as the markets fell hard. The major averages dropped around 3% in just the first two trading days of October. This was on top of some stock market weakness in the second half of September. Justifiably, traders began to chatter about another nightmarish October. But by the end of October’s first week the stock market stabilized and started to move higher.

The major averages were approaching the mid-September highs at the close of last week. As a reminder, these levels are still below the all-time highs reached in July and are only modestly above where prices were last October. Here are the year-to-date returns for the major averages.


Interest rates, which have been declining all year, have been a big driver of stock prices. Lower yields are partially a function of slowing economic growth. However, the Federal Reserve’s switch in strategy from tightening to interest rate cuts and more stimulus has played a large role in the markets.

Besides this policy pivot, there has been a great deal of angst over an explosion in the amount of money borrowed in the repo market. First, the repo (repurchase) market is where funds are loaned and borrowed between banks for short term purposes. It is often an overnight arrangement where one institution has too much cash and another has a shortfall as measured by banking regulations. They enter into a deal in which the lender sends cash to the borrower in exchange for high quality securities (typically treasury notes) with the condition that this loan will be reversed and unwound at some date in the future.

The Federal Reserve has a role in this market as the party that borrowers can come to. However, the Fed is considered the last option as it carries the stigma that the borrower can’t find funds through normal options.

In mid-September the overnight borrowing rates between banks ran into problems and rates spiked. The Fed stepped in and went from being a behind the scenes observer to the major supplier of funds. Below is a chart showing the spike in borrowing from the Fed.



The Fed’s explanation included things such as seasonal funding needs by banks and that they expected this condition to only be temporary. Skeptics called it another form of QE and questioned if some large financial institution is impaired.

More likely it seems that banks with more than sufficient liquidity began to hold the cash rather than enter into a short term loan. In other words, banks are hoarding cash. Part of the reasoning behind this is increased regulations from the financial crisis on liquidity levels and the quality of banking collateral. Of course, it’s possible that the banks see a problem ahead and are positioning for it.

The Fed’s repo window hasn’t been used at this level since the financial crisis. Naturally, that draws comparisons together with concerns that another systemic problem is around the corner. The Fed dismisses these worries and forecasts a return to normal conditions soon.

Regardless the specific reasons for this spike in Fed repos, one of the obvious results is a significant increase of money in the financial system. Logically, some of this liquidity finds its way into the capital markets which usually means higher prices.

Another forthcoming monetary easing event is a Fed decision which, ironically, will be on Halloween. There is wide belief that Jerome Powell and the committee will cut short term interest rates again. Our monetary leaders have a long history of telegraphing their decision and since many traders are anticipating a cut, it’s unlikely that they change their mind.

Fed critics (there are many) question the need to cut interest rates and inject money into the system when unemployment is near record low levels and the economy is expanding. The extension of this worry is that cutting rates now wastes their ammunition. And when something bad does happen, they will have limited options and the situation will deteriorate further.

Central bank supporters are optimistic that proactive decisions will help avoid any problem. Further, we must keep in mind that the U.S. dollar is the world’s reserve currency and, consequently, the Fed plays a partial role as global central banker. Within this context, there are many economically troubled areas throughout the worldwide system. Agree or not, the Fed is aware of this interconnected backdrop.

This likely results in more easing at some point in the future. While this could eventually lead to bigger and far reaching financial problems, it could, in the short run, bring higher asset prices.

Scary stories fill the history of financial markets in the month of October. While the beginning of the 2019 version looked like a repeat of previous spooky spells, things have been surprisingly pleasant. It’s always possible that someone or something suddenly yells “Boo!” and shocks everyone. In the meantime, it looks like a good time for gathering treats with ­little fear of the tricks.

[i] “The Legend of Sleepy Hallow”, Washington Irving

[ii] Bianco Research, October 2019



2nd Quarter Review Letter sent to Clients

The following is a copy of the 2019 2nd quarter letter sent to clients. It reviews the markets and the client account’s activity and performance for the 2nd quarter of 2019.

One of the goals of a business is to be profitable. Of course, the end doesn’t justify the means and the path to profitably is important. The typical trail to success involves offering a desired product or service at a reasonable price. Controlling expenses is critical so there must be focus on the cost side of the equation as well. Combine these efforts (some added luck is always helpful) and the result is hopefully a prosperous organization.

If all goes well and an organization becomes successful, the management will need to decide the best use of the excess cash. Thanks to the Federal Reserve, the return on money is very low and barely above the inflation rate. This forces businesses to look for other options.

There are several reasonable possibilities available. The company can pay a dividend to the owners. This is not the most tax efficient use as it is not tax deductible for the business and is taxable to the recipient. Another option is to pay down any existing debt (bonds or bank loans). A further alternative is to expand the business through purchase of additional plant and equipment. Also, a similar move is to acquire another business.

While these choices are all legitimate considerations for cash, another option has risen to become the favorite of publicly traded companies. Share buybacks or purchasing shares of your company in the open market has become an important part of corporate finance. Companies have been very active buyers of their own stock in recent years. And, best of all, if your company doesn’t have the liquidity  to execute the buyback, it’s no problem because the bond market has been happy to finance the effort.

Stock buybacks were not always so popular. In fact, before 1982, it was illegal. Regulators viewed it as manipulation of stock price if corporations were able to buy their own stock. Things have changed a lot over the years. Now a company’s stock price is scorned if they aren’t buying back their own shares.

The graph below lists the sources of demand for stocks in the U.S. markets duringrecent years. It shows the overwhelming amount that is purchased by corporations. Corporations is the largest category in every year, and it is the only one that is positive in all years.

Clearly buybacks are an important part of the stock market and has been a tailwind for many years. Another essential player in the corporate buyback craze is the bond market. Fixed income investors have continually provided liquidity to corporations by absorbing the constant flow of offerings. And with widespread demand comes attractive interest rates.

These low interest rates are courtesy of the policies of the global central banks which have held interest rates low. On top of holding down interest rates, the Fed, European Central Bank (ECB), and the Bank of Japan have flooded the system with money. This combination results in large pools of money seeking a return.


Another indication of the importance of stock buybacks is the high amount of cash flow devoted to these programs. As the graph below indicates, over 100% of the S&P 500’s free cash flow is now being used for dividend payments and stock repurchase. Free cash flow is generally thought of as cash that remains after maintaining the company’s capital investments. In other words, upkeep on plant, property, equipment, and other long-lived assets.

Corporate managers must prioritize how they use capital and, as mentioned above, there are many worthy options. The ratio has been at this level or higher in the past, but the current deployment shows how central this is for corporate America.



IBM is one of the world’s greatest success stories. They are a model for success with its history of innovation and execution. It is also a posterchild example of this corporate strategy. Big Blue’s long debt totaled a little more than $18 billion in 2000. It has almost doubled to $35.5 billion at the end of 2018.  The use for at least part of this money shows up in a significant reduction in the number of common shares. In 2000, IBM had almost 1.8 billion shares outstanding. That number is approximately half at the end of 2018 coming in around 900 million.

This reduction in share count produces a huge lift in the earnings-per-share calculation without growing the business. The same dollar amount of earnings in 2000 would be twice as much in 2018 when measured on a per share basis. In other words, earnings per share, an essential Wall Street financial measurement, increases without expanding sales and profits. All things being equal, this will translate into a higher stock price. It’s no wonder that this has become such a widespread corporate strategy

This additional debt load is not lost on the credit rating agencies. IBM was once rated AAA (the highest) but has fallen to an A rating. This financial deterioration is a material reason for this. Apparently, conditions haven’t stabilized at this iconic company because Moody’s issued a credit downgrade in July.

As judged by IBM’s stock price appreciation in 2019, investors are willing to forgive the blemishes on the balance sheet. Also, it’s important to remember that IBM is in the Dow Jones Industrial Average and S&P 500. This means if the markets are up, it’s a pretty good chance that IBM is participating.

This has been the case. The stock market, as measured by the S&P 500, just finished its best first half of the year since 1997. As a reminder, this rally was preceded by the worst “December” since just after the 1929 stock market crash. Also, the 4th quarter of 2018 saw a peak to trough drop of 20%. Finally, 2018 was a bad year across many markets as over 90% of all asset classes lost money. Once again, we must go back to the start of the Great Depression to find anything close to this.

It’s natural for markets to bounce after such widespread declines but it’s difficult to figure out the rebound’s timing and length. Part of this process is involves the reasons for the previous turmoil which is difficult to do in real time.

There were a couple of possible sources surrounding 2018’s selloff. The Chinese currency was falling in value against the dollar which increased worries over a systemic problem. Also, tariff and trade war concerns were a constant economic anxiety. Finally, interest rate increases and balance sheet contraction by the Federal Reserve was big market hindrance throughout the year.

While all three were contributors, with hindsight, it appears that the tighter policy by the Fed was the chief culprit. As part of a one-quarter point interest rate increase in December, Fed chairman, Jerome Powell, announced that the balance sheet reduction program was on ‘autopilot’. This meant tighter monetary conditions something the market don’t like. The S&P 500 plunged around 10% in the next week.

In the first week of January, a few weeks after the rate hike decision, Mr. Powell announced a more flexible stance which became to be known as the Powell Pivot. It helped drive U.S. stock prices higher and bond yield lower for the first half of 2019. It is a remarkable reversal that the year began with forecasts of 2 to 3 Federal Reserve interest rate increases in 2019. Seven months later the Fed cuts rates for the first time in over a decade.

The returns for stocks and bonds for the first six months were not without challenges. Continued tariff concerns, geopolitical problems, civil division, and an unknown monetary policy were part of the lengthy list of problems the markets faced. Despite these issues, earnings and economic growth outweighed the negatives and helped push financial assets higher. Here are the major averages’ returns for the 2nd quarter and year to date.


Using a size weighted average, here is how the average Kildare Asset Management-Kerr Financial Group client’s account performed. This is calculated after all fees and expenses.


Looking within the accounts, a couple of developments to note. During the quarter, Pan American Silver Company (symbol is PAAS) became a precious metal play. Gold started to move higher at the end of May and broke out of a trading range in June. I had feared that I missed the move in gold and wanted to wait for a pullback to begin accumulating positions.

Realizing that the price of silver had not rallied as dramatically as gold, I used silver as a cowardly way of having precious metal exposure. While gold and silver can be viewed as complementary, they do not always move together. This ratio recently reached its highest point in over 25 years – meaning gold was historically high relative to silver. If there is a forthcoming return to the mean trade, silver will outperform gold.

Pan American Silver was founded in 1994. It is one of the largest silver mining companies in the world and their mines are in generally safe countries with friendly governments. Pan American’s flagship mine is La Colorado in Mexico which is expected to produce 8.1 million ounces of silver in 2019.  The company is profitable and has 1.3 billion ounces of silver equivalent reserves.

Precious metal investments are historically considered safe havens and can offer protection during inflationary periods. Gold and silver have gained additional interest within today’s environment of negative interest rates. Bonds and other securities that have a yield are in competition with these metals for investor capital. Negative interest rates reduce this competition and make precious metal more attractive. This position might be added to if there is a price correction and the global financial conditions deteriorate.

Bath Bed and Beyond (symbol is BBBY) is another 2nd quarter addition. The company has over 1,500 stores two-thirds of which are the namesake brand. The next biggest and other recognizable name is Christmas Tree Shops. Of course, as is the case for every retailer, Bed Bath and Beyond has invested and enhanced their e-commerce platform.

The challenges facing the retail industry are widely known. Going to the mall is no longer a popular pastime. Competition, the internet, and potential tariffs has squeezed margins. All retailers are forced to transform the shopping experience to keep their customers as well as attract new ones.

BBBY is expected to generate around $12 billion of sales in fiscal year 2020 (the current year). The bottom line is forecast to be slightly less than $2.00 per share. They have a strong balance sheet with a little less than $1 billion in cash and $2.6 billion in inventories. There is $1 billion of accounts payable and $1.5 billion of long-term debt.

Of course, little of this matters when a sector falls out favor with investors. The result is the peculiar situation where Bed Bath and Beyond’s dividend yield is higher than its P/E ratio (prices-to-earnings). The P/E is below 5 while the dividend yield is above 6%. Concerning the dividend, management just raised it which demonstrates their confidence in future cash flows (when a company increases its dividend it is a long-lasting decision that not normally reversed).

Investors want nothing to do with retail and there are many good reasons for this. However, as troubled as conditions are, many remain profitable and offer good long-term value. Bed Bath and Beyond is an example of investors overlooking a company’s financial strength and potential. We are down on our BBBY investments. However, these are smaller positions that will be increased at better prices. I think the stock will rebound in the future.

The markets are likely to face many trials in the second half of 2019. While it looks like the Federal Reserve has changed its policy and will be market friendly, there are lots of other issues. The list includes a slowing economy in international markets, trade wars, geopolitical flare ups, and civil unrest.

Domestically, the United States economy is doing well but there are some concerning signs. A few economic data points such as the Purchasing Managers Index have weakened a little. Also, future earnings estimates have been reduced.

The race for the Democratic Party’s presidential candidate will accelerate later this year. While it may not be on the financial markets shopping list yet, there are many economically unfriendly proposals being offered by the 20 plus candidates in the race. It’s safe to say that the markets will not rally with a 70% marginal personal income tax rate.

But the largest problem is the current discussion in Congress about outlawing corporate buybacks. To be sure, buybacks are controversial. However, removing the biggest source of buying would likely be the beginning of material financial market pain.

While it promises to be an exciting period ahead, I will continue to look for opportunities as well as monitor current positions. I think the markets could be volatile and will try to exercise caution in executing decisions. Thank you for your continued support and please call with any questions.


Jeffrey J. Kerr, CFA 

To Infinity & Beyond!!

Kerr Financial Group
Kildare Asset Mgt.
Jeffrey J. Kerr, CFA

September 23, 2019 – DJIA = 26,935 – S&P 500 = 2,992 – Nasdaq = 8,117

To Infinity and Beyond!!


Interest rates are a critical part of the financial system. They play a big role in determining a borrower’s cost of capital which plays a big role in strategic decisions. The current situation is an artificial and manipulated environment due to central bank policy. The investing world’s acceptance of this interest rates market enables it to continue.

Ten years ago, central banks slashed interest rates in an effort to stabilize the global economy from the financial crisis. Since reducing interest rates had worked in prior recessions, it was the “go to” strategy and considered the proper move. We were confidently assured that this was temporary, and rates would be back to normal in a jiffy. Yet, for the past decade, despite forecasts of rates returning to historically normal levels, it has been a path of steadily lower interest rates.

In addition to cutting interest rates, the world’s monetary leaders included additional strategies to combat the downturn. On top of pumping the system with money and reducing interest rates, these bankers implemented aggressive steps such as broad financial bailouts of total industries and key companies. They pulled out all of the stops.

Again, we were told that these radical and untested tactics were necessary and that it would be only short-lived. Ten years later, this transient remedy has become the norm. And like the frog in a pot as the heat is turned up, we have gradually become immune to dangers and risks that the global bureaucrats have shoveled on the system in name of saving it.

Two weeks ago the European Central Bank announced another round of “quantitative easing”. Specifically, the ECB lowered interest rates to an even lower negative level. The short term rate is now set at minus 0.5% for the reserves that banks hold at the ECB. This means that banks will lose approximately €9 billion per year on these funds that they are required to keep at the ECB .

Another important part of the announcement involves a new asset purchase program. The ECB will be buying €20 billion of bonds per month. This was less than the €30 billion that was expected but, to offset the disappointment, this program is open ended or has no set termination. Traders quickly began calling it “QE Infinity”.

In summary, Mario Draghi and the ECB are re-cycling and re-implementing the same policies that haven’t worked despite over 10 years of trying them. It is astonishing that these people have any credibility. Strangely, it seems, that as long as the system doesn’t implode, they are consider competent.

Of course, it’s not much different on this side of the Atlantic Ocean. Last week the Federal Reserve cut its benchmark interest rate one-quarter of 1%. It was the second cut in the past couple of months. There was some dissention concerning the decision to cut as three of the ten members of the committee voted against it. Chairman Powell pointed to a global slowdown and trade tensions as the chief reasons.

While this interest rate decision was broadly expected by the markets, the Fed was involved in some other unexpected developments last week. The banks have a system of borrowing and lending on an overnight basis. This is based on whether a bank has surplus liquidity or a shortfall according to regulatory measurements. The Fed stands as a lender if needed but, historically, banks view them as a last resort and would rather find the liquidity elsewhere.

Last week, for the first time in a decade, the Fed loaned around $200 billion over three days to banks in the form of short term loans. Many were alarmed and questions were raised on the cause of these developments. Mr. Powell downplayed the news and said it had no economic impact or shift in monetary policy. The capital markets will be watching to see if this is a single occurrence or if this becomes an ongoing problem.

The markets have a lot of confidence in the Federal Reserve’s ability. Perhaps too much. The Fed employs hundreds of PhD’s who are paid several billions of dollars annually. They have access to unlimited technology and computer models to assist in their analysis. Yet, despite all of these abilities and tools, they refer to themselves as being data dependent. In other words, instead of having definitive forecasts of future conditions, as is considered their critical role, they react to economic data as it is released. Apparently, advanced academics and the best programming is a lot more fluff than substance.

The U.S. 10-year note’s yield closed last week at 1.75%. This is a little higher than the start of September (around 1.5%) but down from 2.7% in March. It’s a surprising statistic that the 10-year U.S. Treasury note has provided a total return well above 10% so far in 2019. Likewise, the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond index (the main U.S. fixed income index that includes all bond sectors) has an approximate total return of 10% in 2019. These are attractive returns for a traditionally less volatile asset class (fixed income).

Turning to the stock market, the major indexes slipped around 1% last week. The recent action has been a sell off from record levels in late July and a bounce from mid-August. We remain below July’s highs. Obviously, there are strong economic, social, and political crosscurrents that the markets are digesting. Here are the major indexes year-to-date returns through last Friday.

Contrary to the gains of 2019, the returns for the past 52-weeks (year over year) are much less exciting. The Dow, S&P 500, and Nasdaq are barely positive. The Russell 2000, which may be a closer representation of the average stock, is down almost 9%. As a reminder, 2018’s 4th quarter was one worst in recent years with December being especially bad.

The reality is that stocks have not gained much since the highs in late January 2018. There has been a lot of movement but it’s been a back and forth variety without material progress. This is shown in the chart of the S&P 500. Each bar (candlestick) represents 1 week and the time frame begins in January 2018. The selloffs in February, 2018 and last year’s 4th quarter are clear reminders that stocks have risk.

The future direction of the capital markets will be influenced by interest rates. They are a critical part of the environment and are being controlled global central banks. The following quote from Jim Grant is an accurate painting of the landscape.

Interest rates are probably the most sensitive and consequential prices in capitalism. They balance savings and investment, discount future cash flows, define investment hurdle rates, measure financial risk.

Yet the Fed and its foreign counterparts seek to manipulate, or, at least, to influence, interest rates both long- and short-term. They can’t seem to keep their hand off them.


Wall Street raises no protest against these intrusions. The artificially low rates of the past 10 year have advantaged investors, speculators, and corporate promoters. They have deadened the risk sensors of even professional investors. They are the Jack Daniel’s-grade financial disinhibitors.

The same low rates – by some measure, the lowest in 4,000 years – have penalized savers incentivized dubious risk-taking, expedited the growth in federal indebtedness and perpetuated the lives of businesses that would have ended in the absence of easy credit. They have widened the gulf between rich and poor, thrown a spanner into our politics and inflated the cost of retirement.


The trouble is that the costs of radical monetary policy are dark and prospective; the gifts they bestow are bright and immediate. These gifts are likewise transitory.[i]


During the past 10 years monetary policy has shifted to a higher level of intrusion. Free markets are unarguably less free. So far, the markets have accepted and adjusted to this development. This leads to perhaps the largest risk in the capital markets – a loss of the market’s confidence in central banks and their policies. A confidence crisis is hard to forecast especially since the markets have seemingly approved the current conditions. However, if investors start to doubt monetary leaders, the adjustment could be long and painful.

[i] Grant’s Interest Rate Observer, May 17, 2019

“I Will Follow You, Will You Follow Me”

Kerr Financial Group

Kildare Asset Mgt.

Jeffrey J. Kerr, CFA


August 26, 2019 – DJIA = 25,628 – S&P 500 = 2,847 – Nasdaq = 7,751

“I Will Follow You, Will You Follow Me”

One year ago, on August 14, 2018, the S&P 500 closed at 2,839.96. Earlier this month on August 14, 2019, the S&P 500 closed at 2,840.60. As usual when dealing with the markets, the tranquil appearance of stocks running in place for the past 12 months is a misleading picture compared to reality.

The market mayhem began last fall when stocks dropped over 20% in the 4th quarter. As you may remember, the Fed was raising interest rates and reducing the size of its balance sheet (another monetary tightening mechanism) throughout the year. The market buckled in October and then nosedived in December as interest rate rose to multi year highs and international economies wobbled. Further, market strategists were predicting more interest rates increases in 2019.

Things changed in the first week of January. Federal Reserve chairman Jerome Powell softened his view on future interest rate hikes (this was quickly named the ‘Powell Pivot’) which became music to the market’s ears. Wall Street recognized the importance of this policy switch and began an impressive upswing. The S&P 500 went on to have its best first half of a year in over 20 years (1997).

While a good economy and corporate earnings helped drive stocks higher, it was clear that the markets were intensely following the Fed. But just as important, the Fed was following the markets. Similar to January 4th’s Powell Pivot, which was in response to the market’s upheaval in December, the Fed chairman openly ‘hinted’ on June 4th that the next interest rate decision would be a cut and that it would be happening soon. This triggered a rally that reversed weakness in May and stocks moved to record levels in July.

The Fed’s dual mandate is price stability and full employment. But there is little doubt that the central bank is closely following developments in capital markets. In turn the markets are following every syllable in speeches and news releases from the Fed. Within this reciprocal watching, let’s hope one of these parties knows what they are doing.

Putting some numbers behind this view, the table below shows the impact that Chairman Powell has had on the stock market. As shown, between 60% and 70% of the 2019’s gains took place in the week after significant Powell proclamations. Naturally, the bulls are counting on the Fed having more market friendly ammunition.

Recently the stock market has undergone some indecision. Prices fell at the beginning of August and then have spent the past weeks zig zagging with almost daily 1% moves. Each trading day’s direction is seemingly driven by breaking news about trade wars escalating or subsiding together with rising and declining risks of a possible recession.

Unfortunately, there have been some nasty air pockets in August with daily declines of 600, 700, and 800 points for the Dow Jones Industrial Average. This has resulted in a 4 week losing streak for U.S. stocks. If Mr. Powell is indeed watching, it looks like the stock market might be in need of some soothing words. In the meantime, here are the year-to-date performances for the major stock averages.

Despite the August selloff, U.S. stocks have had a good year. Likewise, the fixed income market has had a good 2019 as interest rates, contrary to expectations, have declined. In addition to last month’s cut in the overnight lending rate by the Fed, the 30-year U.S. Treasury bond recently fell to a record low yield. In fact the longer maturities yields have dropped further than the short end of the yield curve. This has the yield curve inverted (shorter maturities with higher yields than longer maturities) and could be a sign of a forthcoming recession.

Falling interest rates are not exclusively a U.S. development. Interest rates throughout the global financial markets have fallen. The remarkable part to this situation is that many in the world are already below zero! Over $15 trillion of bonds have a negative yield which is up from less than $10 trillion earlier in 2019. Not surprisingly, Bloomberg has developed an index that just tracks the amount of negative yielding debt.

Below is a table of the developed economies’ sovereign debt and the yields for various maturities.[i] As shown, positive yielding government debt (the green color) is at risk of being added to the endangered species list. It is astonishing that all maturities for leading countries such Germany, Sweden and Switzerland have yields below zero. France and Japan are close with only the longest dated bonds still above zero.

The United States offer the best yields among developed economies. The financial media commonly refers to this as the “the cleanest dirty shirt”. A question that is being debated is whether U.S. yields ultimately drop below zero. Several Federal Reserve speakers have suggested using more aggressive strategies when dealing with the next recession or financial system upheaval. This has led to speculation that negative interest rates will eventually part of the U.S. financial landscape.

A recent The Wall Street Journal article reported that the 2nd half of 2019’s earnings estimates are being lowered.[i] S&P 500 companies’ earnings for 2019 were originally forecast to grow 6% as compared to 2018’s level. Now they are expected to be up 1.5% for the year with the 3rd quarter number to be a contraction when compared to the 3rd quarter of 2018. Analysts predict profit growth will return in the 4th quarter. The reasons for these earnings cuts include the usual suspects – tariff uncertainty, slowing global economies, and worries over financial conditions.

The current financial and economic backdrop is a blend of inverted yield curves, negative interest rates, and slowing growth. A big worry is that central banks are fighting this battle with the same methods that have not worked for the past 10 years. One of the largest obstacles is the record amount of debt throughout the world. Government, consumer, and corporate debt totals have been growing for years. At some point the financial system will stop supporting this trend. Some adult decisions on fiscal policy are long overdue.

On the positive side, the U.S. economy is growing. While worries over a recession have increased, there is no definitive sign of one impending. Another, tailwind will likely to come in the form of more interest rate cuts by Jerome Powell and the Fed. If the unknowns around tariffs and trade decrease, global economic conditions might become more balanced.

The S&P 500 was flat over the past 12 months. However, the volatility within this timespan was noteworthy. The markets had a horrid 4th quarter last year. A friendly Fed helped calm investors’ fears and conditions stabilized. However, the crosscurrents impacting the environment are just as serious as last year which is part of the reason markets have been so hard to understand. As the Fed and the capital markets follow each other, there’s hope that working together will result in continued economic growth and calm markets.

[i] Banks, Rutherford, Collins, 1978
[ii] Bianco Research, August 23, 2019
[iii] The Wall Street Journal, August 15, 2019

“Duck, Duck, Goose”


Kerr Financial Group

Kildare Asset Mgt.

Jeffrey J. Kerr, CFA


July 15, 2019 – DJIA = 27,332 – S&P 500 = 3,013 – Nasdaq = 8,244

“Duck, Duck, Goose”


Within Wall Street’s lexicon, there are numerous animal references. Obviously, the most recognizable are the bull and the bear. But there are others including dog (underperforming stock), pigs (greedy investors), sheep (investors following the crowd), and unicorn (startup company).

As it’s widely known, the “bulls” represent optimists who are expecting higher prices. On the other hand, “bears” are worried that there is trouble ahead and believe that financial asset prices will decline. The origin of these metaphors are unclear but one explanation refers to the animals’ respective motion of attack. The bull thrusts his horns upward while a bear swipes his claws in a downward motion.

Another eccentric animal reference within Wall Street’s jargon involves ducks. Despite the vast reach of the capital markets, it’s hard to associate ducks with finance. Like many aphorisms, the origin is uncertain but the meaning is clear. The saying is “When the ducks are quacking, feed them.” The meaning is that when the public demands something new and exciting, Wall Street will find a way to give it to them. Or in other words, offer the assets that meet the demand of the buyers.

The current situation involving quacking ducks is in the IPO (Initial Public Offering) market. The flock is being fed as there was a one-month record dollar volume of IPO’s in May ($16.6 billion). The February to June stretch was the largest four month period of issuance on record.

Some of the noteworthy and highly anticipated deals in 2019 include Uber, Lyft, Beyond Meat, Chewy, The RealReal, and Slack Technologies. Further, there is excitement about upcoming offerings for WeWork, Peloton, and Postmates. Also, Saudi Arabia is considering listing ARAMCO, their government owned oil producing company. The rumors are that the deal could value the company at $2 trillion.

Of course, hot IPO’s are reserved for the largest clients. This means that the public is often shutout of the most desired deals. But remember, if the demand is there Wall Street will find a solution. In this instance, they fed the fowl by forming funds that invest in IPO’s. For example, in 2014, Renaissance Capital launched an ETF that buys IPO’s – naturally the symbol is IPO.

While the ducks are being fed, it may be the equivalent of fast food. Uber’s latest quarterly results showed revenues of $3 billion and a $1 billion loss. Lyft reported $776 million of first quarter revenue and a $1.13 billion dollar loss. WeWork’s 2018 bottom showed a loss of nearly $2 billion. None of these companies are forecasting profitability in the near future.

At the moment, investors don’t have a problem with massive and astounding losses. Of the more than 100 companies that completed a venture capital IPO since 2010, 64% were losing money.[i] Renaissance’s IPO ETF, whose holdings are bleeding red ink, outperformed the S&P 500. The ducks are indeed quacking.

One of the primary reasons such lunacy exists is low interest rates. Global central bank meddling in the fixed income markets is the main culprit. The European Central Bank (ECB) has cornered the continent’s fixed income market. They and the Bank of Japan (BOJ) have bought so many bonds in the name of stimulus that large parts of the fixed income markets trade at negative yields. It’s gotten so bad that some European junk bonds now have negative yields. In other words, some of the least credit worthy borrowers are able to issues debt without paying any interest.

While we don’t have negative interest rates in the U.S. (yet), the Fed is expected to cut rates perhaps as soon as the July meeting. As they make their decision, they are likely sensitive to the unicorn market’s needs for pre-IPO funding. Further, the Fed understands the significance of the sector’s stock market popularity.

Whether admitted or not, another Fed consideration is the stock market itself. On this front everything seems ducky. The three major averages all closed last week at record highs. Furthermore, the S&P 500 had its best “June” since 1955 and the Dow Jones Industrial Average had its best first half of the year since 1999. Here are the year to date performance number at last week’s close.

The second half of July will be the height of quarterly earnings reports. While expectations have been lowered, management’s guidance will be the focus of investors. The reports so far indicate companies don’t have a clear vision of the conditions for their markets. Trade issues and tariff uncertainty are a big part of this problem.

As mentioned in the last newsletter, there is a fair amount of caution. Professional managers had the highest levels of cash in several years and were defensively positioned. This cash won’t stay on the sidelines long especially if June’s move continues. This would result in a self-fulfilling rally as investment managers experience FOMO (fear of missing out).

This might be happening now as there are rumors of hedge funds and trading operations shutting down their short books.  This is part of the portfolio that does short selling which is a bearish strategy that looks to profit from market declines. The unwinding of a short position is to buy the stock or bond back (having previously sold it). If this is what is happening, bears will become an endangered species on Wall Street as stocks keep climbing.

If the markets trade higher, it will create a favorable backdrop for upcoming IPO’s.   Also, it’s possible that the current exhilaration is actually the early innings of this cycle. Nevertheless, given the lack of profitability of these unicorn companies, the IPO craze could suddenly stop.  History contains prior periods of IPO euphoria ending in tears.

Being a bull on Wall Street has been fun this year. Stocks recovered from 2018’s horrible 4th quarter and December sell offs and have returned to record levels. Unicorn investing has probably been a little more fun than being a bull as the investors providing the early capital are getting a chance to cash out. In other words, the ducks are eating well. On the other hand, the bears in the Wall Street zoo have been bruised. While their population is definitely smaller, they are not totally extinct. The bulls shouldn’t get too overconfident as the ursine sloth can start to grow at any time.

[i] Tech Crunch, March 2019